Chase Strategy
Chase Strategy
Section titled “Chase Strategy”Chase Strategy is like hiring helpers only when you need them:
Restaurant example:
- Tuesday (slow): 2 cooks, 1 server
- Friday (busy): 5 cooks, 4 servers
- Sunday (slow again): Back to 2 cooks, 1 server
You’re “chasing” the demand — workforce goes UP and DOWN!
Good for:
- 🍽️ Restaurants (demand changes daily)
- 📦 Amazon holidays (need 100,000 extra workers for Q4)
- 💼 Tax preparers (busy Jan-April, slow rest of year)
Bad for:
- 🏭 Factories with skilled workers (hard to hire/fire quickly)
- ⚙️ When training takes months (workers leave before you benefit)
Problems:
- Workers feel insecure (“Will I have a job next month?”)
- Hiring/firing costs money
- New workers make mistakes
Memory: “Chase the Demand” — like a dog chasing a ball!
Mention in the Slides
Section titled “Mention in the Slides”Chase Aggregate Plans:
- “Produces exactly what is needed each period”
- “Sets labor/equipment capacity to satisfy period demands”
- “Disadvantage: constantly changing short term capacity” [Chapter 5, Slide 22]
Chase Plan Example:
- Period 1: 500 units × 0.64 std / 160 = 2 people (need to fire 16 people)
- Chase hires and fires staff to exactly meet each period’s demand [Chapter 5, Slide 22]
Enrichment
Section titled “Enrichment”Chase Strategy Defined
Section titled “Chase Strategy Defined”The Chase Strategy is an aggregate planning approach that MATCHES production capacity to demand in each period by adjusting workforce and/or equipment levels.
How It Works
Section titled “How It Works”- Forecast demand for each period
- Calculate required capacity (labor, equipment) for each period
- Adjust capacity to match — hire/fire, overtime/idle time, part-time workers
- Produce exactly what is needed, no more, no less
Advantages
Section titled “Advantages”| Advantage | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Minimal Inventory | Produce to demand, no buildup in low periods |
| Cash Flow | Less capital tied up in inventory |
| Obsolescence Risk | Low risk — don’t hold inventory that could become outdated |
| Customer Service | Can respond to demand changes quickly |
Disadvantages
Section titled “Disadvantages”| Disadvantage | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Hiring/Firing Costs | Recruitment, training, severance expenses |
| Morale Impact | Job insecurity reduces employee commitment |
| Quality Issues | New workers make more mistakes |
| Capacity Constraints | May not be able to hire skilled workers quickly enough |
| Supplier Strain | Variable production schedule disrupts suppliers |
When to Use Chase Strategy
Section titled “When to Use Chase Strategy”| Situation | Appropriate? | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| High inventory carrying cost | YES | Minimizes inventory investment |
| Skilled labor required | NO | Hard to hire/fire quickly |
| Strong labor unions | NO | Work rules may prevent flexibility |
| Service operations | YES | Can’t inventory services anyway |
| Perishable products | YES | Can’t build inventory |
| Stable demand | NO | Level strategy more efficient |
Chase vs. Level Strategy
Section titled “Chase vs. Level Strategy”| Aspect | Chase | Level |
|---|---|---|
| Production | Match demand each period | Constant rate |
| Workforce | Varies | Constant |
| Inventory | Minimal | Builds in low periods, depletes in high |
| Hiring/Firing | Frequent | Minimal |
| Best For | Services, perishables, high inventory cost | Manufacturing, stable demand |
Concept
Section titled “Concept”| Term | Definition | Chase Strategy Application |
|---|---|---|
| Aggregate Planning | Planning production, workforce, inventory over 3-18 month horizon | Chase is one approach |
| Workforce Smoothing | Keeping workforce constant | Opposite of chase |
| Overtime/Idle Time | Adjusting hours instead of headcount | Alternative to hiring/firing |
| Part-time Workers | Flexible labor without full commitment | Enables chase without firing |
Examples
Section titled “Examples”From Slides:
-
Chase Plan Calculation:
- Period 1 demand: 500 units
- Standard time: 0.64 hours/unit
- Available hours per worker: 160 hours/month
- Workers needed: (500 × 0.64) ÷ 160 = 2 workers
- If currently have 18 workers: fire 16 workers
-
Disadvantage Illustrated: “Constantly changing short term capacity” — the example shows firing 16 workers in one period, then presumably hiring in later periods as demand changes
Enriched Examples:
-
Restaurant: Uses part-time servers to chase demand. Schedule 5 servers for Friday night, 2 for Tuesday lunch. Can’t inventory meals, so capacity must match demand.
-
Tax Preparation Firm: Hires seasonal workers during tax season (January-April), lays off in May. Demand is highly seasonal; can’t “produce tax returns in advance.”
-
Amazon Holiday Surge: Hires 100,000+ seasonal workers for Q4 holiday peak, then reduces workforce in January. Classic chase strategy for predictable seasonal demand.
-
University Dining Hall: Adjusts staff based on class schedule. Full staff during semester, skeleton crew during breaks. Can’t prepare meals in advance for absent students.
Essay Angle
Section titled “Essay Angle”An essay might ask you to compare chase vs. level strategy for a given scenario or to analyze the appropriateness of chase for a specific operation. Framework: (1) define chase strategy and its characteristics, (2) analyze the operation’s characteristics (inventory costs, labor flexibility, demand patterns), (3) evaluate advantages and disadvantages in context, (4) recommend strategy with justification.
MCQ Watch-outs
Section titled “MCQ Watch-outs”- Chase = Match Demand: Chase strategy MATCHES capacity to demand each period. If a scenario describes constant production with inventory buildup, that’s LEVEL, not chase.
- Hiring/Firing: Chase involves CONSTANTLY CHANGING workforce. MCQs may describe a scenario with stable workforce — that’s NOT chase.
- Service Applicability: Services often MUST use chase (can’t inventory services). Manufacturing has a CHOICE between chase and level.
Memory Aid
Section titled “Memory Aid”CHASE = Change Hiring And Staffing to Execute
- Change workforce each period
- Hire/fire to match demand
- Aggregate planning approach
- Service operations use it
- Exactly what’s needed
Simple Version: “Chase the Demand” — Like a predator chasing prey, capacity follows demand wherever it goes
Sources
Section titled “Sources”Chapter5.pptx [Slide 21-22]