Network Design
Network Design
Section titled “Network Design”Network Design is like deciding where to open lemonade stands in your city:
Big questions:
- How many stands? (1 big one or 10 small ones?)
- Where to put them? (Near schools? Near parks? Near your house?)
- How much lemonade at each? (Big stands = cheaper, but far away)
Trade-offs:
- Few big stands: Cheaper to run, but kids have to walk far
- Many small stands: Close to kids, but expensive (more stands, more workers)
Real examples:
- Amazon: 1000+ warehouses near big cities = fast delivery but super expensive
- Starbucks: A shop on every corner = convenient but lots of rent
Three anchors to think about:
- 🏠 Customers (where are they?)
- 🏭 Suppliers (where do lemons come from?)
- 👷 Workers (where can you hire people?)
Mention in the Slides
Section titled “Mention in the Slides”- Global Network Optimization: “Optimizing global network of suppliers, producers, and distributors” [Chapter 1, Slide 19]
- Supply Chain Members: Coordinating relationships between all members of the supply chain [Chapter 1]
- Location Decisions: Implied in discussions of sourcing and delivering [Chapter 1]
Enrichment
Section titled “Enrichment”Network Design is the strategic process of determining the optimal configuration of suppliers, production facilities, distribution centers, and customers in a supply chain.
Strategic Importance
Section titled “Strategic Importance”Network design decisions are:
- Long-term: Facilities last decades; relationships take years to build
- Capital-intensive: Building/closing facilities costs millions
- Difficult to reverse: Real estate, labor contracts, regulatory approvals
- Competitively decisive: Wrong network = structural cost disadvantage
Key Design Decisions
Section titled “Key Design Decisions”| Decision | Options | Trade-offs |
|---|---|---|
| Number of facilities | Few (centralized) vs. Many (decentralized) | Efficiency vs. Responsiveness |
| Location | Near suppliers vs. Near customers | Input cost vs. Delivery speed |
| Capacity | High utilization vs. Excess capacity | Cost vs. Flexibility |
| Make vs. Buy | In-house vs. Outsource | Control vs. Specialization |
| Labor | Low-cost regions vs. Skilled regions | Cost vs. Quality/Innovation |
Network Design Framework
Section titled “Network Design Framework”-
Define Customer Service Requirements
- Delivery time expectations
- Product variety needs
- Service level requirements
-
Identify Constraints
- Budget/capital available
- Regulatory requirements
- Existing facilities/contracts
-
Map Demand Locations
- Customer concentrations
- Demand volumes by region
- Growth projections
-
Evaluate Supplier/Labor Locations
- Raw material sources
- Labor availability and cost
- Infrastructure quality
-
Optimize Network Configuration
- Facility locations
- Capacity allocation
- Product-to-facility assignment
-
Consider Strategic Factors
- Political/economic stability
- Exchange rate risk
- Sustainability goals
Current Issues in Network Design
Section titled “Current Issues in Network Design”- Globalization vs. Reshoring: Balancing cost advantages of offshoring with resilience and speed of nearshoring
- Sustainability: Carbon footprint considerations in location decisions
- Risk Management: Diversifying suppliers and facilities to reduce disruption risk
- E-commerce Impact: Need for last-mile delivery infrastructure
Concept
Section titled “Concept”| Term | Definition | Network Design Implication |
|---|---|---|
| Centralization | Few large facilities serving broad areas | Economies of scale, longer delivery times |
| Decentralization | Many small facilities close to customers | Faster delivery, higher inventory/fixed costs |
| Nearshoring | Moving production closer to end markets | Higher labor cost, lower transportation, faster response |
| Offshoring | Moving production to low-cost countries | Lower labor cost, longer lead times, higher complexity |
Examples
Section titled “Examples”From Slides:
-
HP DeskJet Global Supply Chain: HP managed a complex global network with multiple manufacturing sites (likely in Asia for cost), distribution centers (regional hubs), and customer markets (global). The case illustrates challenges in coordinating production, inventory, and delivery across international boundaries with different time zones, regulations, and market requirements
-
Coca Cola Vietnam: Coca Cola’s operations in Vietnam demonstrate supply chain network design in an emerging market. The company had to adapt its global network to local conditions — sourcing some ingredients locally, building distribution infrastructure, navigating local regulations
Enriched Examples:
-
Amazon: Network design places fulfillment centers within 20 miles of major metropolitan areas. This enables same-day/next-day delivery but requires massive real estate investment. Over 1,000 facilities worldwide as of 2024.
-
Toyota: Supplier network organized in tiers:
- Tier 1: Direct suppliers (often co-located with assembly plants)
- Tier 2: Suppliers to Tier 1
- Tier 3: Raw material suppliers
- Key insight: Geographic proximity reduces transportation cost and enables JIT
-
IKEA: Designs products for flat-pack shipping → minimizes shipping volume → can source globally and still offer low prices. Network designed around product architecture.
-
Zara: Unusual network design — most manufacturing in/near Spain (higher cost) but enables 2-3 week design-to-store cycle. Trade-off: Higher labor cost for faster response
Essay Angle
Section titled “Essay Angle”An essay might ask you to design a supply chain network for a given scenario or evaluate trade-offs in network design. Framework: (1) identify customer service requirements, (2) list key design decisions (number, location, capacity of facilities), (3) analyze trade-offs (efficiency vs. responsiveness, cost vs. risk), (4) recommend optimal configuration with justification.
MCQ Watch-outs
Section titled “MCQ Watch-outs”- Strategic vs. Tactical: Network design is STRATEGIC (long-term, capital-intensive, hard to reverse). Routing, scheduling, and inventory management are TACTICAL (short-term, adjustable).
- Centralization Trade-off: Centralization = lower costs (scale), slower delivery. Decentralization = faster delivery, higher costs. MCQs may ask which to choose based on scenario priorities.
- Multiple Factors: Network design considers customers, suppliers, AND labor. Not just one factor.
Memory Aid
Section titled “Memory Aid”NETWORK = Nodes, Economics, Response, Trade-offs, Optimization, Workforce, Customers
- Nodes (facilities, DCs, suppliers)
- Economics (scale vs. speed)
- Response time (delivery speed)
- Trade-offs (cost vs. service)
- Workforce (labor availability/cost)
- Optimization (math models help)
- Risk (diversification)
- Keys: Customers, Suppliers, Locations
Simple Version: “C-S-L = Customers, Suppliers, Labor” — the three anchors of network design
Sources
Section titled “Sources”Chapter1.pptx [Slide 19], Chapter7.pptx [Slide 3-4]